From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramiscal v. Nitto Haw. Co.

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Jan 6, 2016
NO. CAAP-15-0000602 (Haw. Ct. App. Jan. 6, 2016)

Opinion

NO. CAAP-15-0000602

01-06-2016

FELICISIMO L. RAMISCAL, Claimant-Appellant v. NITTO HAWAII COMPANY, LTD., SILVERSWORD GOLF CLUB and FIRMS CLAIMS SERVICES, Respondents-Appellees


NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI'I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER APPEAL FROM THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS APPEALS BOARD
(CASE NO. AB 2014-297(M)) (7-99-01417) ORDER DISMISSING THE APPEAL PURSUANT TO HRAP RULES 11(b)(2) AND (c) (2)
(By: Nakamura, C.J., Fujise and Reifurth, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that:

(1) On August 20, 2015, Claimaint-Appellant Felicisimo L. Ramiscal (Appellant), pro se, filed a notice of appeal with the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board, Case Nos. AB 2014-297(M) and AB 2014-186(M). On August 26, 2015, the notice of appeal was electronically filed to create this appeal, CAAP-15-0000602, from LIRAB Case No. AB 2014-297(M);

(2) On November 13, 2015, the appellate clerk notified Appellant that the time to docket the record on appeal expired on October 19, 2015, the filing fees had not been paid, the record on appeal cannot be prepared without the fees or an order authorizing Appellant to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, the matter would be called to the court's attention on November 23, 2015, for appropriate action, which may include dismissal, and Appellant may file a motion requesting relief from default;

(3) Appellant did not pay the filing fees, give security for costs, or take any further action in this appeal; and

(4) An appeal may be dismissed where the record on appeal has not been prepared because the appellant failed to pay the required fees or obtain an order allowing the appellant to proceed in forma pauperis. Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 11(b)(2), (c)(2).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.

Dated: Honolulu, Hawai'i, January 6, 2016

/s/

Chief Judge

/s/

Associate Judge

/s/

Associate Judge


Summaries of

Ramiscal v. Nitto Haw. Co.

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Jan 6, 2016
NO. CAAP-15-0000602 (Haw. Ct. App. Jan. 6, 2016)
Case details for

Ramiscal v. Nitto Haw. Co.

Case Details

Full title:FELICISIMO L. RAMISCAL, Claimant-Appellant v. NITTO HAWAII COMPANY, LTD.…

Court:INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

Date published: Jan 6, 2016

Citations

NO. CAAP-15-0000602 (Haw. Ct. App. Jan. 6, 2016)