From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 19, 1990
566 So. 2d 939 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 90-1928.

September 19, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Thomas M. Coker, Jr., J.

Edurado B. Ramirez, Belle Glade, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joan Fowler, Asst. State Atty., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


The trial court summarily denied appellant's 3.850 motion on the ground that although the motion was under oath, the appellant had incorporated four pages of facts which were not under oath, citing Daniels v. State, 450 So.2d 601 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). However, unlike Daniels, the factual recitation here was not part of a separate pleading but was part of the motion itself, being a lengthy recitation of the facts upon which the motion was based. The verification clause states that all facts set forth are true and correct. Thus, the motion properly comports with Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 1985), and summary denial based on Daniels was error. This cause is therefore reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and WARNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ramirez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 19, 1990
566 So. 2d 939 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Ramirez v. State

Case Details

Full title:EDURADO B. RAMIREZ, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 19, 1990

Citations

566 So. 2d 939 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Dorsey v. State

The motion and memorandum were properly sworn. See Nava v. State, 659 So.2d 1314 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Ramirez…