From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 23, 1972
476 S.W.2d 309 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972)

Opinion

No. 44848.

February 23, 1972.

Appeal from the 167th District Court, Travis County, Tom Blackwell, J.

M.N. Garcia, Austin, for appellant.

Robert O. Smith, Dist. Atty., and Michael J. McCormick, Asst. Dist. Atty., Austin, and Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


OPINION


The conviction is for the possession of heroin; the punishment, ten years imprisonment.

The appellant's court-appointed counsel on appeal has filed a brief which raises no ground of error and states "Counsel further finds there is no other error upon which a non-frivolous appeal might be based." The record does not reflect that a copy of the brief was served upon the appellant as is required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969); Holder v. State, 469 S.W.2d 184 (Tex.Crim.App. 1971); Barber v. State, 471 S.W.2d 814 (Tex.Crim.App. 1971). This appeal will be abated until the record shows that there has been a compliance with the above cited authorities. See Simmons v. State, 475 S.W.2d 787 Grant, 476 S.W.2d 702 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972).

For the reasons stated, the appeal is abated.

Opinion approved by the court.


Summaries of

Ramirez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 23, 1972
476 S.W.2d 309 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972)
Case details for

Ramirez v. State

Case Details

Full title:Joe Leyba RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Feb 23, 1972

Citations

476 S.W.2d 309 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972)

Citing Cases

Ramirez v. State

The conviction is for the possession of heroin; the punishment, ten years' imprisonment. We first faced this…