From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Long

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 31, 2014
NO. CV 12-9852-SVW (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2014)

Opinion

NO. CV 12-9852-SVW (MAN)

03-31-2014

ERICK RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. DAVID B. LONG, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ("Petition"), all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"). The time for filing Objections to the Report has passed and no Objections have been filed with the Court. Having completed its review, the Court concludes that the Petition is untimely and accepts and adopts the Report and the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations therein.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Respondent's motion to dismiss is GRANTED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

________

STEPHEN V. WILSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Long

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 31, 2014
NO. CV 12-9852-SVW (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2014)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Long

Case Details

Full title:ERICK RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. DAVID B. LONG, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 31, 2014

Citations

NO. CV 12-9852-SVW (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2014)

Citing Cases

Hecht v. Paramo

See R&R at 7; see also, e.g., Payne v. Gipson, 2013 WL 693011, *4 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 15, 2013) ("[P]etitioner…