Opinion
For Kathleen Bicondova, Beatrice Ramirez, Plaintiffs: Andrea Darrow Smith, LEAD ATTORNEY, Ryan Sean Carrigan, Smith and Carrigan Law Group P.C., Riverside, CA.
For Legal Recovery Law Offices, Inc., Defendant: Hunter H Hoestenbach, LEAD ATTORNEY, Hoestenbach Law, San Diego, CA.
Present: The Honorable JESUS G. BERNAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
Proceedings: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Why the Case Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute
JESUS G. BERNAL, J.
On December 9, 2014, Defendant Legal Recovery Law Offices, Inc. (" Defendant") moved to dismiss Plaintiffs Kathleen Bicondova and Beatrice Ramirez's (" Plaintiffs") Complaint. (Doc. No. 14.) The Court granted the motion, and, on January 5, 2015, dismissed Plaintiffs' Complaint with leave to amend. (" Order, " Doc. No. 17.) The Order explained that Plaintiffs should file an amended complaint by January 30, 2015. (Id. at 7.) Plaintiffs never filed an amended complaint.
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiffs TO SHOW CAUSE why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiffs must respond to this order by July 3, 2015. Failure to respond will result in dismissal of the case with prejudice. See Thompson v. Housing Auth., 782 F.2d 829, 831 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 829, 107 S.Ct. 112, 93 L.Ed.2d 60 (1986) (" District courts have the inherent power to control their dockets and, '[i]n the exercise of that power they may impose sanctions including, where appropriate . . . dismissal of a case.'").
IT IS SO ORDERED.