Opinion
Civil Action 4:21-cv-03780
02-21-2023
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
GEORGE C. HANKS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On February 23, 2022, all pretrial matters in this case were referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Dkt. 9. Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation on February 1, 2023, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 11) be DENIED, and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 12) be GRANTED.
No objections have been filed to the Memorandum and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court reviews the Memorandum and Recommendation for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).
Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:
(1) Judge Edison's Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; and
(2) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 11) is DENIED; and
(3) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 12) is GRANTED.
It is so ORDERED.