From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. James

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 26, 2024
24-cv-03064-AGT (N.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-03064-AGT

07-26-2024

ELIAS TORRES RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. JAMES, Defendant.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ALEX G. TSE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Elias Torres Ramirez hasn't filed an amended complaint, and the deadline by which to do so has now passed. For the reasons identified in the prior screening order (dkt. 5), the undersigned requests that the Clerk of the Court reassign Ramirez's case to a district judge and recommends that the district judge dismiss Ramirez's complaint, without leave to amend, for failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

Ramirez may object to this recommendation but must do so within fourteen days of receiving a copy of it. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ramirez v. James

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 26, 2024
24-cv-03064-AGT (N.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Ramirez v. James

Case Details

Full title:ELIAS TORRES RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. JAMES, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 26, 2024

Citations

24-cv-03064-AGT (N.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2024)