From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Hearst Commc'ns

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 24, 2021
21 Civ. 9109 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 9109 (LGS) 21 Civ. 9334 (LGS)

11-24-2021

MARIBEL RAMIREZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. HEARST COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant, MAGDA LOPEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. HEARST COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant,


ORDER

LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, United States District Judge:

WHEREAS, the parties in the above-captioned cases were directed to submit letters stating why the cases should not be consolidated.

WHEREAS, no party opposes consolidation. It is hereby

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall consolidate case 21 Civ. 9109 (as lead case) with case 21 Civ. 9334. All filings made after the issuance of this Order in connection with the above-captioned cases shall be entered in the docket of the lowest-numbered case, 21 Civ. 9109. 1

After consolidation, the Clerk of Court shall amend the caption of this consolidated action to be: “Maribel Ramirez, et al. v. Hearst Communications, Inc.” The Clerk of Court is further directed to close the higher-numbered case, 21 Civ. 9334. 2


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Hearst Commc'ns

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 24, 2021
21 Civ. 9109 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Hearst Commc'ns

Case Details

Full title:MARIBEL RAMIREZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 24, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 9109 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 2021)