From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Francisco

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 24, 2023
1:23-cv-00162-JLT-HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 24, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-00162-JLT-HBK (PC)

05-24-2023

ISRAEL MALDONADO RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCO, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE (DOC. 8)

On April 12, 2023, the Court entered an order adopting the assigned magistrate judge's findings and recommendations, denied Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis due to Plaintiff having three strikes under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, and directed Plaintiff to pay the $402.00 filing fee within 30 days of service of the order. (Doc. 8 at 1-2.) The Court warned Plaintiff that failure to comply and pay the filing fee would result in the dismissal of the action without prejudice. (Id. at 2.) The time to respond has now lapsed, and Plaintiff has not paid the requisite filing fee. (See docket.) /// ///

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Pursuant to the April 12, 2023 Order, this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, due to Plaintiff's failure to pay the filing fee.

2. The Clerk of Court shall terminate any pending motions/deadlines, enter judgment accordingly, and close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Francisco

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 24, 2023
1:23-cv-00162-JLT-HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Francisco

Case Details

Full title:ISRAEL MALDONADO RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCO, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 24, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-00162-JLT-HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 24, 2023)