From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramey v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Sep 28, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-23684 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 28, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-23684 Criminal No. 2:12-cr-00154

09-28-2016

THOMAS RAMEY JR., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Pending before the Court is Petitioner's Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (the "Petition"). (ECF No. 30.) By Standing Order filed in this case on October 1, 2013, this action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort for submission of proposed findings of fact and recommendations for disposition. (ECF No. 33.) On January 6, 2016, the Clerk entered an order transferring the referral of this case to United States Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn. (ECF No. 38.) On May 5, 2016, Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn filed his proposed findings of fact and recommendations for disposition (the "PF&R"), in which he recommends that the Court deny the Petition and remove this matter from the Court's docket. (ECF No. 41.)

The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and the Plaintiff's right to appeal this Court's order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984).

Objections to the PF&R in this case were due by May 23, 2016. (See ECF No. 41 at 14-15.) To date, no objections have been filed.

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the PF&R, (ECF No. 41), DENIES the Petition, (ECF No. 30), DISMISSES this case, and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove this matter from the Court's docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: September 28, 2016

/s/_________

THOMAS E. JOHNSTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ramey v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Sep 28, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-23684 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 28, 2016)
Case details for

Ramey v. United States

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS RAMEY JR., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Sep 28, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-23684 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 28, 2016)