From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rambert v. Mooney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 29, 2018
2:15cv1088 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 29, 2018)

Opinion

2:15cv1088

08-29-2018

ERIC X. RAMBERT, Petitioner, v. VINCENT T. MOONEY and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondents.


Electronic Mail
Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan MEMORANDUM ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Eric X. Rambert ("Petitioner") on July 14, 2015, wherein he claims that the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections improperly aggregated his sentences. (ECF No. 1.) In accordance with the Magistrate Judge's Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules of Court, all pretrial matters were referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan.

Respondents filed a Response to the Petition on October 15, 2015 (ECF No. 15), and Petitioner responded by filing a reply brief in opposition on October 26, 2015 (ECF No. 17). Petitioner also filed a supplemental reply brief on January 7, 2016 (ECF No. 21), a supplement in support of his Petition on March 22, 2016 (ECF No. 22), and another supplement in support of his Petition on July 19, 2016 (ECF No. 29).

On July 26, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the Petition be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and that no certificate of appealability issue. (ECF No. 41.) The R&R was served on the parties who were informed that objections were due by August 13, 2018. As of today, no objections have been filed. Therefore, after careful de novo review, the following Order is now entered.

AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2018;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 41) is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court enter judgment in favor of Respondents and mark this case CLOSED.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Petitioner has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

s/ DAVID STEWART CERCONE

David Stewart Cercone

Senior United States District Judge cc: Eric X. Rambert

AM-9223

SCI Fayette

P.O. Box 9999

LaBelle, PA 15450

(Via First Class Mail)

Timothy Mazzocca, Esquire

(Via CM/ECF Electronic Mail)


Summaries of

Rambert v. Mooney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 29, 2018
2:15cv1088 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 29, 2018)
Case details for

Rambert v. Mooney

Case Details

Full title:ERIC X. RAMBERT, Petitioner, v. VINCENT T. MOONEY and PA STATE ATTORNEY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 29, 2018

Citations

2:15cv1088 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 29, 2018)

Citing Cases

Rambert v. Zaken

Rambert also appears to have challenged the aggregation of his 1983 and 1987 sentences on at least two other…