From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ralston v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 14, 2012
Civil Case No. 09-cv-14790 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 14, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 09-cv-14790

02-14-2012

MARY E. RALSTON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES (DKT. 37)

This matter is presently before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Laurie J. Michelson, entered on August 30, 2011 (Dkt. 42). The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff's motion for award of attorney fees (Dkt. 37) in the amount of $7563.50, to be paid directly to Plaintiff's counsel. Defendant has not filed objections to the R&R and the time to do so has expired. Thus, Defendant has waived any further right to appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985). The Magistrate Judge found in the R&R that the Defendant agency was not substantially justified in denying Plaintiff's application for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income, given that the ALJ failed to consider and/or discuss significant evidence bearing on Plaintiff's disability. Further, the Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff's hourly rate for calculating attorney fees is reasonable. The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds that the Magistrate Judge has reached the correct result for the correct reasons.

Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge's R&R is accepted and adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Plaintiff's motion for attorney fees (Dkt. 37) is granted in the amount of $7563.50 and is to be paid directly to Plaintiff's Counsel.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 14, 2012

Flint, Michigan

______________________

MARK A. GOLDSMITH

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on February 14, 2012.

DEBORAH J. GOLTZ

Case Manager


Summaries of

Ralston v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 14, 2012
Civil Case No. 09-cv-14790 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Ralston v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MARY E. RALSTON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 14, 2012

Citations

Civil Case No. 09-cv-14790 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 14, 2012)

Citing Cases

Vock v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

In substituting her opinion, she failed to give proper weight and consideration to the opinions of Dr. Yoon…

Miller v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

On this and similar precedent, several courts in this circuit have held that clerical tasks that do not…