From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raley v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 6, 1943
16 So. 2d 206 (Ala. Crim. App. 1943)

Opinion

8 Div. 257.

March 16, 1943. Rehearing Denied April 6, 1943.

Appeal from Law and Equity Court, Lauderdale County; Raymond Murphy, Judge.

Violating Code 1940, Tit. 14, § 54.

Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Raley v. State, 245 Ala. 153, 16 So.2d 207.

Jos. A. Padway, of Washington, D.C., and Merwin T. Koonce and A.A. Williams, both of Florence, for appellant.

Wm. N. McQueen, Acting Atty. Gen., and L.S. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


This case, as to the two controlling questions presented by the appeal, is in pari similibus with the cases of Lash v. State, ante, p. 121, 14 So.2d 235 and Threet v. State, post, p. 133, 16 So.2d 195, this day decided by this court.

In the said Lash and Threet cases, it was pointed out that an affirmance of the judgments of conviction, respectively, was due to be entered pursuant to an opinion delivered to this court by our Supreme Court. Code 1940, Title 13, Sec. 95.

Upon authority, therefore, of said cases (Lash and Threet), the judgment of the lower court in this case is ordered affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Raley v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 6, 1943
16 So. 2d 206 (Ala. Crim. App. 1943)
Case details for

Raley v. State

Case Details

Full title:Roy RALEY v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Apr 6, 1943

Citations

16 So. 2d 206 (Ala. Crim. App. 1943)
31 Ala. App. 132