From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rakoski v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 18, 2010
37 So. 3d 391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. 5D09-813.

June 18, 2010.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, J. David Walsh, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Rose M. Levering, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Tina Marie Rakoski appeals her sentence and the denial of her motion to correct sentence. We affirm without discussion, except as to condition number 30 of Rakoski's community control order. We strike condition 30 as the statute cited as authority for the assessment of this cost, section 948.02, Florida Statutes, was renumbered in 1977 as section 945.26, Florida Statutes (1977), which in turn was repealed in 1985. See Ch. 85-288 § 27, Laws of Fla.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

GRIFFIN, ORFINGER and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rakoski v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 18, 2010
37 So. 3d 391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Rakoski v. State

Case Details

Full title:Tina Marie RAKOSKI, Appellant v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jun 18, 2010

Citations

37 So. 3d 391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)