Opinion
20-CV-10473 (LLS)
01-05-2021
SAMANTHA D. RAJAPAKSE, Plaintiff, v. SEYFARTH SHAW; ROBERT SZYBA; CARLA LAINGAN, Defendants.
ORDER TO AMEND
LOUIS L. STANTON, United States District Judge
Plaintiff, appearing pro se, invokes the Court's federal question jurisdiction, alleging that Defendants violated her rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. By order dated December 29, 2020, the Court granted Plaintiff's request to proceed without prepayment of fees, that is, in forma pauperis (“IFP”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within sixty days of the date of this order.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
The Court must dismiss an IFP complaint, or any portion of the complaint, that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); see Livingston v. Adirondack Beverage Co., 141 F.3d 434, 437 (2d Cir. 1998). The Court must also dismiss a complaint when the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3).
While the law mandates dismissal on any of these grounds, the Court is obliged to construe pro se pleadings liberally, Harris v. Mills, 572 F.3d 66, 72 (2d Cir. 2009), and interpret them to raise the “strongest [claims] that they suggest, ” Triestman v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 470 F.3d 471, 474 (2d Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted) (emphasis in original). But the “special solicitude” in pro se cases, id. at 475 (citation omitted), has its limits -to state a claim, pro se pleadings still must comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which requires a complaint to make a short and plain statement showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.
The Supreme Court has held that under Rule 8, a complaint must include enough facts to state a claim for relief “that is plausible on its face.” Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). A claim is facially plausible if the plaintiff pleads enough factual detail to allow the Court to draw the inference that the defendant is liable for the alleged misconduct. In reviewing the complaint, the Court must accept all well-pleaded factual allegations as true. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009). But it does not have to accept as true “[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, ” which are essentially just legal conclusions. Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555. After separating legal conclusions from well-pleaded factual allegations, the Court must determine whether those facts make it plausible - not merely possible - that the pleader is entitled to relief. Id.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, a resident of Chattanooga, Tennessee, submitted her claims using the Court's general complaint form. She checks the box to invoke the Court's federal question jurisdiction, and in the space to indicate which of her federal constitutional or federal statutory rights have been violated, Plaintiff writes, “Fourteenth Amendment.” (ECF No. 2, at 2.) She names as defendants Seyfarth Shaw, a law firm with offices in New York, Chicago, and Massachusetts; Robert Szyba, who appears to be a partner at Seyfarth; and Carla Laingan, who Plaintiff lists as “counsel” and for whom she provides a Boston, Massachusetts address. (Id. at 4.)
Plaintiff states that her claims arise from events occurring in New York, Boston, and Tennessee from June 2020 to December 3, 2020. (Id. at 5.) In the “facts” section of the complaint form, Plaintiff writes, “Please see attach complaint.” (Id.) But she does not attach a complaint and her submission includes no other factual allegations.
As her injuries, Plaintiff lists “denial of security background check, afraid to use credit & denial, denial of credit, [and] emotional & physical damages.” (Id. at 6.) She seeks $1 million in “physical damages.” (Id.)
Plaintiff writes with irregular capitalization. For readability, the Court uses standard capitalization when quoting from the complaint.
DISCUSSION
A. Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
The complaint does not comply with Rule 8's requirement that it provide a short and plain statement showing that Plaintiff is entitled to relief. Plaintiff's complaint does not allege any facts, and her submission appears to be incomplete. The Court is therefore unable to determine whether Plaintiff has stated a claim. The Court therefore grants Plaintiff 60 days' leave to file an amended complaint.
B. Venue
Under the general venue provision, a civil action may be brought in:
(1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located; (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred . . .; or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court's personal jurisdiction with respect to such action.28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). For venue purposes, a “natural person” resides in the district where the person is domiciled. 28 U.S.C. § 1391(c)(1). And an entity that is not a person, “whether or not incorporated, shall be deemed to reside, if a defendant, in any judicial district in which such defendant is subject to the court's personal jurisdiction with respect to the civil action in question.” § 1391(c)(2).
Plaintiff alleges that she is a resident of Chattanooga, Tennessee. She describes Seyfarth Shaw as having offices in New York, Chicago, and Massachusetts, and provides a Chicago, Illinois address. Plaintiff provides addresses for the individual defendants in New York, New York and Boston, Massachusetts. Though the complaint does not include specific factual allegations, Plaintiff asserts that her claims arose in New York, Boston, and Tennessee. In any amended complaint, Plaintiff should allege facts showing that venue is proper in this district.
LEAVE TO AMEND
Plaintiff is granted leave to amend her complaint to detail her claims and to allege facts showing that venue is proper in this Court. In the statement of claim, Plaintiff must provide a short and plain statement of the relevant facts supporting each claim against each defendant named in the amended complaint. Plaintiff is also directed to provide the addresses for any named defendants. To the greatest extent possible, Plaintiff's amended complaint must:
a) give the names and titles of all relevant persons;
b) describe all relevant events, stating the facts that support Plaintiff's case including what each defendant did or failed to do;
c) give the dates and times of each relevant event or, if not known, the approximate date and time of each relevant event;
d) give the location where each relevant event occurred;
e) describe how each defendant's acts or omissions violated Plaintiff's rights and describe the injuries Plaintiff suffered; and
f) state what relief Plaintiff seeks from the Court, such as money damages, injunctive relief, or declaratory relief.
Essentially, the body of Plaintiff's amended complaint must tell the Court: who violated her federally protected rights; what facts show that her federally protected rights were violated; when such violation occurred; where such violation occurred; and why Plaintiff is entitled to relief. Because Plaintiff's amended complaint will completely replace, not supplement, the original complaint, any facts or claims that Plaintiff wishes to maintain must be included in the amended complaint.
CONCLUSION
The Clerk of Court is directed to transmit a copy of this order to Plaintiff. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint that complies with the standards set forth above. Plaintiff must submit the amended complaint to this Court's Pro Se Intake Unit within sixty days of the date of this order, caption the document as an “Amended Complaint, ” and label the document with docket number 20-CV-10473 (LLS). An Amended Complaint form is attached to this order. No summons will issue at this time. If Plaintiff fails to comply within the time allowed, and she cannot show good cause to excuse such failure, the complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
Plaintiff has consented to electronic service of Court filings. (ECF No. 3.)
In light of the current global health crisis, parties proceeding pro se are encouraged to submit all filings by email to TemporaryProSeFiling@nysd.uscourts.gov. Pro se parties who are unable to use email may submit documents by regular mail or in person at the drop box located at the U.S. Courthouses in Manhattan (500 Pearl Street) and White Plains (300 Quarropas Street). For more information, including instructions on this new email service for pro se parties, please visit the Court's website at nysd.uscourts.gov.
SO ORDERED