From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rajapakse v. Shaw

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 14, 2021
20-CV-10473 (VEC) (OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2021)

Opinion

20-CV-10473 (VEC) (OTW)

12-14-2021

SAMANTHA D. RAJAPAKSE, Plaintiff, v. SEYFARTH SHAW, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge:

Plaintiff's motions dated December 11, 2021 (ECF 70) and December 14, 2021 (ECF 71) are DENIED. Both motions, which in substance ask Chief Judge Swain to overturn the interlocutory orders of the undersigned and Judge Caproni, were filed without leave from the undersigned. See ECF 63, 66, 67, 69; see also 28 U.S.C. § 1292.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se Plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rajapakse v. Shaw

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 14, 2021
20-CV-10473 (VEC) (OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Rajapakse v. Shaw

Case Details

Full title:SAMANTHA D. RAJAPAKSE, Plaintiff, v. SEYFARTH SHAW, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 14, 2021

Citations

20-CV-10473 (VEC) (OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2021)