From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rains v. Allstate Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 7, 2018
CV 17-301 DSF (SSx) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2018)

Opinion

CV 17-301 DSF (SSx)

06-07-2018

ROSALIE RAINS, Plaintiff, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. Defendants.


JUDGMENT

The Court having granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant Allstate Insurance Company,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Rosalie Rains take nothing, that the action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, and that Defendant recover its costs of suit pursuant to a bill of costs filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1920. Date: June 7, 2018

/s/_________

Dale S. Fischer

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rains v. Allstate Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 7, 2018
CV 17-301 DSF (SSx) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2018)
Case details for

Rains v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:ROSALIE RAINS, Plaintiff, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 7, 2018

Citations

CV 17-301 DSF (SSx) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2018)

Citing Cases

Foster v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

The three days prior to notification must then be counted against the one-year limitations period. Cf. Rains…

Banga v. Ameriprise Auto & Home Ins. Agency

That an insurer “closes” a claim instead of “denying” a claim is “a distinction without a difference for…