From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rainey v. Thorstad

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 31, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00945-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 31, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00945-CMA-MEH

10-31-2012

JOHN RAINEY, Plaintiff, v. BRYCE THORSTAD, LYNNE TRAVIS, JOSEPH SOTO, SGT. MARQUEZ, K. ROETKER, and SGT. MONTGOMERY, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on October 31, 2012.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s "Motion With Information of Facts" [filed October 29, 2012; docket #61]. Plaintiff titles the document as though it were a motion; however, Plaintiff seeks no actual relief. Instead, Plaintiff simply describes a series of events and provides several exhibits in support thereof. Though Plaintiff may, at a later stage, be asked to submit evidence in support of his claims, the present filing is premature and improper. Therefore, Plaintiff’s "Motion With Information of Facts" is denied.


Summaries of

Rainey v. Thorstad

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 31, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00945-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 31, 2012)
Case details for

Rainey v. Thorstad

Case Details

Full title:JOHN RAINEY, Plaintiff, v. BRYCE THORSTAD, LYNNE TRAVIS, JOSEPH SOTO, SGT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 31, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00945-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 31, 2012)

Citing Cases

Holloman v. Schnurr

Here, Holloman alleges no facts indicating that what occurred was other than a brief, isolated incident.…