From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raimondo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 12, 1995
652 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 93-00866.

April 12, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Robert B. Bennett, Judge.

Susan J. Silverman, Sarasota, Specially Appointed Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


The appellant, Michael J. Raimondo, Jr., challenges his judgment and sentence for indirect criminal contempt based on a violation of an injunction for protection issued pursuant to section 784.046, Florida Statutes (1991). Raimondo raises five points on appeal. We find merit in only one. As Raimondo argues, and the state concedes, the trial court erred by failing to recite, either orally or in writing, the facts constituting the contempt as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840(f). See Bryant v. State, 637 So.2d 339 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We therefore reverse the judgment and remand for entry of a corrected judgment. In all other respects, we affirm.

BLUE and FULMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Raimondo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 12, 1995
652 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Raimondo v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL J. RAIMONDO, JR., APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 12, 1995

Citations

652 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)