From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raimondi v. Flask

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Feb 2, 2018
67 N.Y.S.3d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

61 CA 16–02203

02-02-2018

Joseph A. RAIMONDI and Lisa M. Raimondi, Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. Joseph C. FLASK, The Quikrete Companies, Inc., Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P., and Idealease of Central New York, LLC, Defendants–Appellants.

HURWITZ & FINE, P.C., BUFFALO (MICHAEL F. PERLEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS–APPELLANTS JOSEPH C. FLASK AND THE QUIKRETE COMPANIES, INC. SUGARMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, BUFFALO (MICHAEL A. RIEHLER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., L.P. KENNEY SHELTON LIPTAK NOWAK LLP, BUFFALO (MELISSA A. FOTI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT IDEALEASE OF CENTRAL NEW YORK, LLC. GELBER & O'CONNELL, LLC, AMHERST (TIMOTHY G. O'CONNELL OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS–RESPONDENTS.


HURWITZ & FINE, P.C., BUFFALO (MICHAEL F. PERLEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS–APPELLANTS JOSEPH C. FLASK AND THE QUIKRETE COMPANIES, INC.

SUGARMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, BUFFALO (MICHAEL A. RIEHLER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., L.P.

KENNEY SHELTON LIPTAK NOWAK LLP, BUFFALO (MELISSA A. FOTI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT IDEALEASE OF CENTRAL NEW YORK, LLC.GELBER & O'CONNELL, LLC, AMHERST (TIMOTHY G. O'CONNELL OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS–RESPONDENTS.

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.


Summaries of

Raimondi v. Flask

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Feb 2, 2018
67 N.Y.S.3d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Raimondi v. Flask

Case Details

Full title:Joseph A. RAIMONDI and Lisa M. Raimondi, Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. Joseph…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 2, 2018

Citations

67 N.Y.S.3d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)