From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Railroad Commission of Texas v. Humble Oil Refining

U.S.
Jan 6, 1941
311 U.S. 578 (1941)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS.

No. 57.

Argued December 12, 1940. Decided January 6, 1941.

Decided upon the authority of Railroad Commission of Texas v. Rowan Nichols Oil Co., ante, p. 570. Decree vacated.

Mr. James P. Hart, Assistant Attorney General of Texas, with whom Messrs. Gerald C. Mann, Attorney General, Edgar W. Cale, Tom D. Rowell, Jr., and E.R. Simmons, Assistant Attorneys General, were on the brief, for appellants. Mr. Norman L. Meyers was on a brief for G.A. Sadler, appellant.

Mr. Rex G. Baker, with whom Messrs. Robert E. Hardwicke, E.E. Townes, and R.E. Seagler were on the brief, for appellee.


This case is a companion case to Railroad Commission v. Rowan Nichols Oil Co., ante, p. 570. There are minor variations in the facts of the two cases, but not of sufficient moment to call for particularization. The decision in the Rowan Nichols case is decisive of this.

The decree is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for dismissal of the complaint.

Vacated.

The CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS and MR. JUSTICE ROBERTS dissent.


Summaries of

Railroad Commission of Texas v. Humble Oil Refining

U.S.
Jan 6, 1941
311 U.S. 578 (1941)
Case details for

Railroad Commission of Texas v. Humble Oil Refining

Case Details

Full title:RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS ET AL. v . HUMBLE OIL REFINING CO

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 6, 1941

Citations

311 U.S. 578 (1941)

Citing Cases

Phillips v. United States

There martial law was employed in support of an order of the Texas Railroad Commission limiting production of…