From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raglin v. Saabcast, LLC

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 4, 2022
22-cv-04451-SK (C.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-04451-SK

10-04-2022

Deondre Raglin v. Saabcast, LLC


Present: The Honorable: Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

For the reason checked below, Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause on or before October 18, 2022 why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

X Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a Defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Plaintiff has failed to file a proof of service within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint on Defendant Saabcast, LLC.
Plaintiff can satisfy this order by showing that service was effectuated within the 90 day deadline or by showing good cause for the failure to do so. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m).

Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Raglin v. Saabcast, LLC

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 4, 2022
22-cv-04451-SK (C.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2022)
Case details for

Raglin v. Saabcast, LLC

Case Details

Full title:Deondre Raglin v. Saabcast, LLC

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 4, 2022

Citations

22-cv-04451-SK (C.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2022)