From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raglin v. Martinez

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 21, 2022
CV 22-6790-DMG (MAAx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2022)

Opinion

CV 22-6790-DMG (MAAx)

12-21-2022

Deondre Raglin v. Fernandez Martinez et al.


Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). Generally, defendant must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States).

In the present case, it appears that these time periods have not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before December 28, 2022 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.

No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a written response on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed if a written response demonstrating good cause is not filed by the date indicated above. 1


Summaries of

Raglin v. Martinez

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 21, 2022
CV 22-6790-DMG (MAAx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Raglin v. Martinez

Case Details

Full title:Deondre Raglin v. Fernandez Martinez et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 21, 2022

Citations

CV 22-6790-DMG (MAAx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2022)