From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ragan v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Apr 14, 2014
No. 5:13-cv-336-DPM (E.D. Ark. Apr. 14, 2014)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

No. 5:13-cv-336-DPM

04-14-2014

DANNY J. RAGAN PLAINTIFF v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY DEFENDANT

D.P. Marshall

JUDGMENT

All Ragan's claims against Union Pacific Railroad Company are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the parties' settlement.

__________

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge

Summaries of

Ragan v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Apr 14, 2014
No. 5:13-cv-336-DPM (E.D. Ark. Apr. 14, 2014)
Case details for

Ragan v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.

Case Details

Full title:DANNY J. RAGAN PLAINTIFF v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY DEFENDANT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Apr 14, 2014

Citations

No. 5:13-cv-336-DPM (E.D. Ark. Apr. 14, 2014)

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Hartford Life Ins. Co. v. Trimble

(1) Where a series of instructions contains a complete exposition of the law and covers every phase of the…

Buchanan v. Ralls County

It is the tendency of the act in question that is to be considered. Vital v. Girard, 2 How. (U.S.) 197;…

2 Citing Cases