Raeth v. Bank One

Full title: PENNY J. RAETH, Plaintiff, v. BANK ONE, now BANK ONE CHASE, or CHASE…

Court: United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jan 8, 2008

Civil Action No. 05-cv-02644-WDM-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 8, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-cv-02644-WDM-BNB.

January 8, 2008

ORDER

BOYD BOLAND, Magistrate Judge

This matter is before me on the following motions (the "Motions") filed by the plaintiff:

1. Request for Confirmation of Proper or Acceptable Service [Doc. #42, filed 3/5/07] wherein plaintiff seeks confirmation from the Court that she has properly served Chase Bank USA, N.A.;

2. Motion for Extention [sic] of 30 Days to Properly Serve in Accordance with Judge Miller's Order . . . [Doc. #48, filed 4/13/07] wherein plaintiff seeks a thirty day extension of time in which to serve Chase Bank USA, N.A.;

3. Motion to Correct Location of the First Part of My Complaint From #5 of Parties Page to Be Repeated and Considered as the 1^st Part of Page 1. . . . [Doc. #50, filed 4/30/07]; and

4. Request for Clarification; and 30 Day Extention [sic] of Time [Doc. #64, filed 7/23/07] wherein plaintiff seeks a thirty day extension of time in which to answer JPMorgan Chase Co.'s Motion to Dismiss.¹

1 I note that the plaintiff filed her response on July 10, 2007 [Doc. #62].

I have recommended that this case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.1 for failure to prosecute, insufficiency of service of process, failure to timely effect service of process as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and failure to comply with an Order of this Court. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Motions are DENIED AS MOOT.