From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RAEL v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Mar 12, 2008
8:07CV432 (D. Neb. Mar. 12, 2008)

Summary

In Rael, the ALJ's only mention of the VA's disability finding was to describe it and state that the VA's standards differed from Social Security's and were non-binding. The court determined reversal was required in part because the ALJ "fail[ed] to provide any reasons for rejecting the VA's disability determination."

Summary of this case from Hutchison v. Astrue

Opinion

8:07CV432.

March 12, 2008


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF


IT IS ORDERED that:

1. the Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Plaintiff's Brief, filing 9, is granted;
2. the plaintiff shall have on or before April 12, 2008, in which to file and serve his brief;
3. that the defendant shall have 35 days from the date on which the plaintiff's brief is filed in which to file an answer brief;
4 that within one week after the defendant's answer brief is filed, the plaintiff may file a reply brief and either party may request oral argument or make any other request which may be permitted under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and
5. that in the absence of an order setting the case for oral argument or scheduling further proceedings, the case shall be deemed to be submitted at the expiration of the time period specified in paragraph 4 hereof.


Summaries of

RAEL v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Mar 12, 2008
8:07CV432 (D. Neb. Mar. 12, 2008)

In Rael, the ALJ's only mention of the VA's disability finding was to describe it and state that the VA's standards differed from Social Security's and were non-binding. The court determined reversal was required in part because the ALJ "fail[ed] to provide any reasons for rejecting the VA's disability determination."

Summary of this case from Hutchison v. Astrue
Case details for

RAEL v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

Case Details

Full title:GILBERT RAEL, Plaintiff, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Michael J…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Mar 12, 2008

Citations

8:07CV432 (D. Neb. Mar. 12, 2008)

Citing Cases

Redd v. Colvin

In addition, "[a]lthough Morrison states that an ALJ should state her reasons for rejecting the VA's…

McCall v. Saul

In addition, "an ALJ gives proper consideration to a VA disability determination if she considers and…