From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Radford v. Jackson

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Apr 29, 2024
4:23-cv-00677-LPR-ERE (E.D. Ark. Apr. 29, 2024)

Opinion

4:23-cv-00677-LPR-ERE

04-29-2024

TOMMY RADFORD ADC #089900 PLAINTIFF v. MOSES JACKSON, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has reviewed the Partial Recommended Disposition (PRD) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin (Doc. 32). No objections have been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. After a de novo review of the PRD, along with careful consideration of the entire case record, the Court hereby approves and adopts the PRD in its entirety as this Court's findings and conclusions in all respects.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's claims against Defendant J. Jones are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure of service. The Clerk is instructed to terminate J. Jones as a party Defendant.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Radford v. Jackson

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Apr 29, 2024
4:23-cv-00677-LPR-ERE (E.D. Ark. Apr. 29, 2024)
Case details for

Radford v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:TOMMY RADFORD ADC #089900 PLAINTIFF v. MOSES JACKSON, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Apr 29, 2024

Citations

4:23-cv-00677-LPR-ERE (E.D. Ark. Apr. 29, 2024)