From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Radchuck v. City of Citrus Heights

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 24, 2013
Case No.: 2:11-CV-00486-JAM-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:11-CV-00486-JAM-CKD

01-24-2013

MARINA RADCHUCK, et al. Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS, et al., Defendants. CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS, JEREMY HATCHELL and NANCY WIEGEL, Counter-Claimants v. MARINA RADCHUCK, ESTATE OF BARYS RADCHUCK, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Counter-Defendants

Bruce D. Praet SBN 119430 FERGUSON, PRAET & SHERMAN Attorneys for Defendants/Counter-Claimants


Bruce D. Praet SBN 119430
FERGUSON, PRAET & SHERMAN
Attorneys for Defendants/Counter-Claimants

ORDER re STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE MATTER WITH PREJUDICE


[F.R.Civ.P., Rule 41(a)(2)]

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this entire matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs and fees.

_______________

John A. Mendez United States District Court

Judge


Summaries of

Radchuck v. City of Citrus Heights

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 24, 2013
Case No.: 2:11-CV-00486-JAM-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2013)
Case details for

Radchuck v. City of Citrus Heights

Case Details

Full title:MARINA RADCHUCK, et al. Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 24, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 2:11-CV-00486-JAM-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2013)