From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rachel v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Jun 25, 2019
577 S.W.3d 526 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. ED 106679

06-25-2019

Kavin RACHEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

FOR APPELLANT: N. Scott Rosenblum, Jessica Hathaway, 120 South Central Avenue, Suite 130, Clayton, Missouri 63105. FOR RESPONDENT: Evan J. Buchheim, Eric Schmitt, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.


FOR APPELLANT: N. Scott Rosenblum, Jessica Hathaway, 120 South Central Avenue, Suite 130, Clayton, Missouri 63105.

FOR RESPONDENT: Evan J. Buchheim, Eric Schmitt, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., James M. Dowd, J., and Robin Ransom, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Kavin D. Rachel appeals the denial following an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Rachel v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Jun 25, 2019
577 S.W.3d 526 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Rachel v. State

Case Details

Full title:Kavin RACHEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Jun 25, 2019

Citations

577 S.W.3d 526 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)