From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rabe Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
May 4, 1973
304 A.2d 485 (Pa. 1973)

Opinion

September 28, 1972.

May 4, 1973.

Mortgages — Status of mortgagee as to property other than mortgaged property — General creditor — Mortgagee who seeks satisfaction of the obligation without proceeding against the subject real estate.

1. Beyond the mortgaged property, a mortgage does not constitute a lien and hence, as against other property, the mortgagee's status is that of a general creditor.

2. Should the mortgagee choose to seek satisfaction of the obligation secured by the mortgagee without proceeding against the subject real estate, he is regarded as asserting the rights of an unsecured, general creditor only.

3. As between a claim of the Commonwealth and a claim of a general creditor against the insolvent estate of an incompetent, the Commonwealth has statutory priority.

Mr. Justice MANDERINO dissented.

Mr. Justice NIX took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Before JONES, C. J., EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY and MANDERINO, JJ.

Appeal, No. 79, March T., 1972, from decree of Court of Common Pleas, Orphans' Court Division, of Washington County, No. 63-70-705, in re estate of David Leroy Rabe, a former incompetent. Decree vacated and matter remanded.

Audit of second and final account of guardian. Before MARINO, J.

Account confirmed and schedule of distribution filed. Exceptions of Commonwealth to schedule of distribution dismissed. Commonwealth appealed.

Roger J. Ecker, Special Counsel, with him J. Shane Creamer, Attorney General, for Commonwealth, appellant. Kathleen Kelly Curtin, with her James M. Seif, Assistant United States Attorney, and Richard L. Thornburgh, United States Attorney, for United States, appellee.


David Leroy Rabe was adjudicated an incompetent in June of 1961, and the Mellon National Bank and Trust Company was appointed guardian of his estate. Almost nine years later, on April 23, 1970, David Rabe was declared competent and the guardian was directed to file its final account. At the hearing on audit of the account, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania filed a claim of $5,817.90 against the former incompetent's estate for care and maintenance provided to Rabe at Torrance State Hospital during the period November, 1960 through July, 1968. On the authority of the Act of June 1, 1915, P. L. 661, § 6, 71 P. S. § 1786, the Commonwealth argued that its claim must take precedence over those of all general creditors.

For an earlier decision involving this estate see Rabe Estate, 437 Pa. 72, 261 A.2d 603 (1970), where we granted leave to the guardian to utilize cash asests of the estate to satisfy existing mortgage deficiencies.

The United States also filed a claim in the amount of $1,557.05 for disability annuities incorrectly paid to David Rabe under The Railroad Retirement Act, 45 U.S.C. § 228b(a)(5) (1970). That claim was entitled to priority over all other claims, 31 U.S.C. § 191 (1970), and that priority was honored by the lower court. The United States has filed here a brief as "appellee" solely to protect its preferred position. We do not disturb the lower court's distribution to the United States.

The Western Pennsylvania National Bank, holder of a first mortgage on real property owned jointly by the former incompetent and his wife, also filed a claim against the incompetent's estate for the unpaid balance of principal of the mortgage loan, for interest from June 24, 1965 through September 1, 1970, and for miscellaneous costs and insurance premiums paid by the bank, all in the sum of $7,393.98.

The lower court in its adjudication and decree of distribution allowed the claim of the mortgagee Bank as a preferred claim, taking precedence over that of the Commonwealth. Because the assets of the estate were insufficient to pay all claims proved, the decree allowed the Commonwealth only the sum of $419.58 in satisfaction of its claim. The Commonwealth's exceptions were overruled and this appeal followed. We will vacate the decree of distribution and remand the matter for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is elementary law that a mortgagee has a lien on the reality which secures the mortgage debt, subject to preexisting liens and encumbrances of record. Beyond the mortgaged property, however, the mortgage does not constitute a lien and hence, as against other property, the mortgagee's status is that of a general creditor. 24 P.L.E. Mortgages § 101, at 521; Cake Estate, 157 Pa. 457, 27 A. 773 (1893); Elbert Estate, 3 Pa. C.C. 611 (1887) Should the mortgagee choose to seek satisfaction of the obligation secured by the mortgage without proceeding against the subject real estate, he is regarded as asserting the rights of an unsecured, general creditor only. Bank of America v. Sunseri, 311 Pa. 114, 166 A. 573 (1933); 25 P.L.E. Mortgages § 273, at 124 (and cases therein cited).

In the instant case there is no indication that the mortgagee Bank desires to proceed against the mortgaged property. Nor does that property appear in the guardian's second and final audit. It follows that the Western Pennsylvania National Bank in this proceeding is a general creditor only and has no lien on assets distributed by the decree of the lower court. Therefore, as between the Commonwealth and the mortgagee, a general creditor, the Commonwealth has statutory priority. By our calculation, the assets are sufficient to allow the entire claim of the Commonwealth, leaving some $900 for distribution to the general creditors.

Act of June 1, 1915, P. L. 661, § 6, 71 P. S. § 1786 (emphasis added): All claims by the Commonwealth for maintenance, as herein provided, in the distribution of any of the estate of any person so maintained, shall take precedence and be paid after other claims which by law are now given precedence, and before any claims of general creditors.

Decree of distribution is vacated and the matter remanded for the entry of a decree consistent with this opinion.

Costs on appellant.

MR. JUSTICE MANDERINO dissents.

Mr. Justice NIX took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Rabe Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
May 4, 1973
304 A.2d 485 (Pa. 1973)
Case details for

Rabe Estate

Case Details

Full title:Rabe Estate

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: May 4, 1973

Citations

304 A.2d 485 (Pa. 1973)
304 A.2d 485

Citing Cases

In re Brown

In Pennsylvania the recording of a mortgage creates a lien on the realty which secures the mortgage debt. In…

D'Angelo v. Blue Chip Fed. Credit Union (In re D'Angelo)

The mortgagee is only a general creditor as to other real property. In re Rabe's Estate, 452 Pa. 212, 304…