From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raar v. Kinross Corr. Facility Warden

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Aug 13, 2014
SC: 149532 (Mich. Aug. 13, 2014)

Opinion

SC: 149532

08-13-2014

RANDALL A. RAAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KINROSS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY WARDEN, Defendant-Appellee.


Order

149532 (32) Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano, Justices COA: 319423

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion for reconsideration is DENIED. The holding in Smith v Bennett, 365 US 708, 710 (1961), was based in part on the U.S. Supreme Court's earlier decision in Burns v Ohio, 360 US 252, 253 (1959), which held that a state cannot "constitutionally require that an indigent defendant in a criminal case pay a filing fee before permitting him to file a motion for leave to appeal in one of its courts." [Emphasis added.] Although Smith v Bennett precludes a court from refusing to docket and decide a habeas corpus action because of the inability to pay the filing fee, nothing in the decision mandates that there be a complete waiver of court fees. Accordingly, the Clerk shall retain plaintiff's pleadings for an additional 21 days to allow plaintiff to comply with the Court's July 23, 2014 order.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 13, 2014

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Raar v. Kinross Corr. Facility Warden

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Aug 13, 2014
SC: 149532 (Mich. Aug. 13, 2014)
Case details for

Raar v. Kinross Corr. Facility Warden

Case Details

Full title:RANDALL A. RAAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KINROSS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Aug 13, 2014

Citations

SC: 149532 (Mich. Aug. 13, 2014)