From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co. v. Pappas

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 12, 2023
2:21-cv-00753-DJC-AC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00753-DJC-AC

12-12-2023

R. R. DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. JOHN PAPPAS III, an individual, MERILIZ, INC., dba DOME PRINTING, PM CORPORATE GROUP, INC. dba PM PACKAGING, DOME PRINTING AND PACKAGING, LLC and DOES 110, Defendant.

Mark A. Romeo, Bar No. 173007 Derek S. Hecht, Bar No. 273039 Linde K. Blocher, Bar No. 330239 LITTLER MENDELSON P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff R. R. DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY


Mark A. Romeo, Bar No. 173007 Derek S. Hecht, Bar No. 273039 Linde K. Blocher, Bar No. 330239 LITTLER MENDELSON P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff R. R. DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF R. R. DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY'S REQUEST TO SEAL PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS TO COMPEL AMENDED DISCOVERY RESPONSES

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff R. R. DONELLEY & SONS COMPANY's (“RRD”) Request to Seal Portions of RRD's Motions to Compel Amended Discovery Responses (the “Request”), all supporting and opposition papers submitted in connection with the Request, and all papers and pleadings on file in this matter, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS ORDERED that RRD's Request is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that RRD may file the following Motions and supporting documents under seal:

1. Portions of the Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement in support of RRD's Motion to Compel Amended Responses to RRD's Special Interrogatories from Defendant DPP (DKT 128):

a. Pages 3:1-2; 13:19-23; 17:15-18; 21:13-17.

2. Portions of the Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement in support of RRD's Motion to Compel Amended Responses to RRD's Requests for Production of Documents from Defendant DPP (DKT 129):

a. Pages 2:19-20; 3:6; 4:3-5; 4:7; 5:3, 5:17; 5:27-6:3; 6:5-7; 6:11-12; 6:2123; 7:8-9; 7:18-20; 7:23-24; 8:4-5; 8:19; 9:1-2; 9:4-14; 9:22-23; 10:8; 10:25-26; 11:11; 12:1; 12:15; 12:22; 13:27; 14:19-20; 15:1; 15:10; 15:14; 15:28; 16:7; 16:20-22; 16:27; 17:13; 17:20; 18:3-4; 18:7; 18:16; 19:2; 19:9; 19:20-22; 19:25; 20:5; 20:19; 20:26; 21:12; 21:21.

3. Portions of the Declaration of Derek Hecht (“Hecht Decl.”) attached to the Joint Statements re Discovery Disagreement in support of RRD's Motions to Compel Amended Responses to (1) RRD's Special Interrogatories to DPP (DKT 128); (2) RRD's Requests for Production of Documents DPP (DKT 129); (3) RRD's Special Interrogatories to PMC (DKT 130); and (4) RRD's Requests for Production of Documents to PMC (DKT 131):

a. Page 4:22-23, 4:25-5:1.

4. Exhibits to the Hecht Declaration in support of the above Motions to Compel:

a. Exhibit E, in its entirety; Exhibit H, in its entirety; Exhibit J, pp. 3-4; Exhibit M, in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co. v. Pappas

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 12, 2023
2:21-cv-00753-DJC-AC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2023)
Case details for

R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co. v. Pappas

Case Details

Full title:R. R. DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. JOHN…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 12, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-00753-DJC-AC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2023)