From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quon v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Sep 15, 2011
373 P.3d 953 (Nev. 2011)

Opinion

No. 59120.

09-15-2011

Nancy E. QUON, Petitioner, v. The EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF the STATE of Nevada, in and for the COUNTY OF CLARK; and the Honorable Doug Smith, District Judge, Respondents, and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Real Party in Interest.

Alverson Taylor Mortensen & Sanders Kravitz, Schnitzer, Sloane & Johnson, Chtd.


Alverson Taylor Mortensen & Sanders

Kravitz, Schnitzer, Sloane & Johnson, Chtd.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This original petition for a writ of mandamus seeks to compel the district court to strike as untimely a peremptory challenge. Having reviewed the petition and supporting documents, we are not persuaded that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted. NRAP 21(b)(1) ; Smith v. District Court, 107 Nev. 674, 818 P.2d 849 (1991). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

We deny petitioner's motion for stay as moot in light of this order.

--------


Summaries of

Quon v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Sep 15, 2011
373 P.3d 953 (Nev. 2011)
Case details for

Quon v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

Case Details

Full title:Nancy E. QUON, Petitioner, v. The EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF the…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Sep 15, 2011

Citations

373 P.3d 953 (Nev. 2011)