From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quinn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sep 30, 2022
351 So. 3d 618 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 3D22-0920

09-30-2022

Albert QUINN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Albert Quinn, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Albert Quinn, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LINDSEY, GORDO, and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Albert Quinn appeals the trial court's order denying his motion to clarify sentence without an evidentiary hearing. The trial court found the motion to be successive. We agree. See Quinn v. State, 336 So. 3d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) ; State v. McBride, 848 So. 2d 287, 289-90 (Fla. 2003) (explaining that the law of the case "doctrine requires that ‘questions of law actually decided on appeal must govern the case in the same court and the trial court, through all subsequent stages of the proceedings’ " (quoting Fla. Dep't. of Transp. v. Juliano, 801 So. 2d 101, 105 (Fla. 2001) )).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Quinn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sep 30, 2022
351 So. 3d 618 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Quinn v. State

Case Details

Full title:Albert QUINN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Sep 30, 2022

Citations

351 So. 3d 618 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)