Quinn v. State

Full title: Albert Quinn, Appellant, v. The State of Florida, Appellee.

Court: Florida Court of Appeals, Third District

Date published: Sep 30, 2022

No. 3D22-0920 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Sep. 30, 2022)

Opinion

3D22-0920

09-30-2022

Albert Quinn, Appellant, v. The State of Florida, Appellee.

Albert Quinn, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lower Tribunal Nos. F95-6047, F93-27442 Zachary James, Judge.

Albert Quinn, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LINDSEY, GORDO, and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM

Albert Quinn appeals the trial court's order denying his motion to clarify sentence without an evidentiary hearing. The trial court found the motion to be successive. We agree. See Quinn v. State, 336 So.3d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022); State v. McBride, 848 So.2d 287, 289-90 (Fla. 2003) (explaining that the law of the case "doctrine requires that 'questions of law actually decided on appeal must govern the case in the same court and the trial court, through all subsequent stages of the proceedings'" (quoting Fla. Dep't. of Transp. v. Juliano, 801 So.2d 101, 105 (Fla. 2001))).

Affirmed.