Quinn v. State

Full title: Michael Scott QUINN, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court: Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Mar 30, 2017

No. 04-16-00802-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 30, 2017)

Opinion

No. 04-16-00802-CR

03-30-2017

Michael Scott QUINN, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2013CR6620A
Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant's attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 368 U.S. 738 (1967), as well as a motion to withdraw; however, neither the brief nor the motion is accompanied by an exhibit showing that counsel has:

? informed appellant of appellant's pro se right to seek discretionary review should the court of appeals declare appellant's appeal frivolous; or

? notified appellant that, should appellant wish to exercise the right to review the appellate record in preparing to file a response to the Anders brief, appellant should immediately file a motion for pro se access to the appellate record with this court and provided appellant with a form motion for this purpose and a mailing address for this court.

See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.). It is therefore ORDERED that appellant's attorney file the requisite exhibit in this court no later than 10 days from the date of this order.

/s/_________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 30th day of March, 2017.

/s/_________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court