From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quinn v. Sigretto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1930
229 App. Div. 727 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

April, 1930.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. While the trial court had power to correct the judgment if it had included interest to which plaintiff was not entitled, the denial of defendant's motion was proper, because plaintiff was entitled, under section 480 of the Civil Practice Act, to have interest added to the verdict and included in the judgment, even though not demanded in the complaint or proved on the trial. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Amd. by Laws of 1927, chap. 623. — REP.


Summaries of

Quinn v. Sigretto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1930
229 App. Div. 727 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Quinn v. Sigretto

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW F. QUINN, Respondent, v. JOSEPH L. SIGRETTO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1930

Citations

229 App. Div. 727 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Citing Cases

Stentor Electric Mfg. Co. v. Klaxon Co.

In the absence of proof of a fixed date of breach, interest is computed and added from the date of…

Rigopoulos v. Kervan

Rule 60(a) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Stentor Elec. Mfg. Co. v. Klaxon, D.C., 30 F. Supp. 425, at page…