From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quinn-Jacobs v. Moquin

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 11, 2021
195 A.D.3d 1463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

635 CA 20-01268

06-11-2021

Kathleen QUINN-JACOBS and David Quinn-Jacobs, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ross MOQUIN, M.D., et al., Defendants, and Crouse Hospital, Defendant-Respondent.

EDELMAN & EDELMAN, P.C., NEW YORK CITY ( DAVID M. SCHULLER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS. GALE GALE & HUNT, LLC, SYRACUSE ( ANDREW R. BORELLI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.


EDELMAN & EDELMAN, P.C., NEW YORK CITY ( DAVID M. SCHULLER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

GALE GALE & HUNT, LLC, SYRACUSE ( ANDREW R. BORELLI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the amended order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.


Summaries of

Quinn-Jacobs v. Moquin

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 11, 2021
195 A.D.3d 1463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Quinn-Jacobs v. Moquin

Case Details

Full title:Kathleen QUINN-JACOBS and David Quinn-Jacobs, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 11, 2021

Citations

195 A.D.3d 1463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
195 A.D.3d 1463

Citing Cases

Quinn-Jacobs v. Moquin

In appeal No. 1, we conclude that Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in declining to grant leave to…

Quinn-Jacobs v. Moquin

In appeal No. 1, we conclude that Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in declining to grant leave to…