From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quigley v. City of Missoula

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION
May 17, 2019
CV 19-35-M-DLC-JCL (D. Mont. May. 17, 2019)

Opinion

CV 19-35-M-DLC-JCL

05-17-2019

MEGAN AURORA QUIGLEY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MISSOULA, and COUNTY OF MISSOULA, Defendants.


ORDER

United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch entered his Findings and Recommendations on April 1, 2019, recommending that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. (Doc. 6 at 2.) Plaintiff did not object to the Findings and Recommendations and so has waived the right to de novo review thereof. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Absent objection, this Court reviews findings and recommendations for clear error. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted). Reviewing for clear error and finding none,

IT IS ORDERED that Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 6) are ADOPTED IN FULL and this case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(2) for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

DATED this 17th day of May, 2019.

/s/_________

Dana L. Christensen, Chief District Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Quigley v. City of Missoula

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION
May 17, 2019
CV 19-35-M-DLC-JCL (D. Mont. May. 17, 2019)
Case details for

Quigley v. City of Missoula

Case Details

Full title:MEGAN AURORA QUIGLEY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MISSOULA, and COUNTY OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION

Date published: May 17, 2019

Citations

CV 19-35-M-DLC-JCL (D. Mont. May. 17, 2019)