From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quezada v. Mia Jewels Ecommerce Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 15, 2021
21-CV-4680 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 15, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-4680 (JPO)

12-15-2021

JOSE QUEZADA, Plaintiff, v. MIA JEWELS ECOMMERCE CORP., Defendant.


ORDER

J. PAUL OETKEN, DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendant was served on June 7, 2021. However, no appearance has been entered on Defendant's behalf, and no response to the complaint has been filed in the allotted time. Plaintiff has not moved for a default judgment.

Plaintiff is directed to notify the Court whether it intends to move for default judgment, or if it has received any communication from Defendant or its counsel regarding a response to the complaint.

If Plaintiff fails by December 29, 2021, to either (1) file a letter concerning the status of the case, or (2) move for default judgment against Defendant, the action may be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of this order by mail on Defendant.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Quezada v. Mia Jewels Ecommerce Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 15, 2021
21-CV-4680 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Quezada v. Mia Jewels Ecommerce Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOSE QUEZADA, Plaintiff, v. MIA JEWELS ECOMMERCE CORP., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 15, 2021

Citations

21-CV-4680 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 15, 2021)