From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quezada v. Kidrobot, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 10, 2021
21 Civ. 2152 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 10, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 2152 (ER)

12-10-2021

JOSE QUEZADA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. KIDROBOT, LLC, Defendant.


ORDER

EDGARDO RAMOS, U.S.D.J.

On March 11, 2021, Jose Quezada brought this action against Kidrobot, LLC (“Kidrobot”) for violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act and related claims. Doc. 1. On March 18, 2021, Quezada filed his First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Doc. 5. Kidrobot was served with the FAC on May 10, 2021 but has neither appeared nor responded to the complaint. Doc. 8. On August 24, 2021, Quezada filed for, and the Clerk of Court issued, a Clerk's certificate of default. Docs. 12-14. To date, Quezada has not moved the Court for a default judgment in accordance with the Court's individual rules.

Quezada is therefore directed to move for default or submit a status report by December 23, 2021 . Failure to do so may result in dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 41(b).

It is SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Quezada v. Kidrobot, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 10, 2021
21 Civ. 2152 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Quezada v. Kidrobot, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOSE QUEZADA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 10, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 2152 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 10, 2021)