From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quezada v. Foodservicedirect.Com, Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 15, 2021
21 Civ. 4064 (PAE) (OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 15, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 4064 (PAE) (OTW)

07-15-2021

JOSE QUEZADA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. FOODSERVICEDIRECT.COM, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge

On May 6, 2021, plaintiff filed the complaint. Dkt. 1. On May 11, 2021, the case was referred to Magistrate Judge Wang for general pretrial supervision. Dkt. 5. The same day, Judge Wang scheduled an initial conference. Dkt. 6.

On May 27, 2021, defendant was served with the summons and complaint. Dkt. 7. Defendant having not appeared, on July 7, 2021, plaintiff moved to adjourn the initial conference in anticipation of a forthcoming motion for a default judgment. Dkt. 8. Judge Wang granted that motion. Dkt. 9. On July 14, 2021, plaintiff requested a Clerk's Certificate of Default, Diets. 10-11, which issued the same day, Dkt. 12.

Defendant has still not appeared. Accordingly, by August 12, 2021, plaintiff shall submit a motion for default judgment that complies with the Court's Individual Rules and Practices, available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-paul-engelmayer.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Quezada v. Foodservicedirect.Com, Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 15, 2021
21 Civ. 4064 (PAE) (OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Quezada v. Foodservicedirect.Com, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOSE QUEZADA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jul 15, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 4064 (PAE) (OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 15, 2021)