From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Querol v. Richards

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 25, 2023
22-cv-01800-JD (N.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-01800-JD

09-25-2023

ROMMEL QUEROL, Plaintiff, v. RICHARDS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE SERVICE

JAMES DONATO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleged that he suffered a severe injury due to unsafe work conditions at the prison. After the Court dismissed the case at screening, the Ninth Circuit concluded that plaintiff had stated a claim. Service is ordered on defendants Richards, Maready, Smith, Bell, Robertson, Lacy and Lemos. Once defendants waive service or are served, and counsel for them appears, this case will be referred for mediation to the Northern District of California Pro Se Prisoner Mediation Program.

CONCLUSION

1. The Court orders that the following defendants be served electronically at Pelican Bay State Prison: Correctional Officer Richards who was assigned to the A-Facility kitchen, Maready who was a cook at the A-Facility kitchen, Lieutenant A. Smith, Warden J. Robertson, Captain J. Lacy, Associate Warden T. Lemos and D. Bell.

Service on the listed defendants will be effected via the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation's (CDCR) e-service program for civil rights cases from prisoners in CDCR custody. In accordance with the program, the Clerk is directed to serve on CDCR via email the following documents: the operative complaint (Dkt. No. 8), this order of service, a CDCR Report of E-Service Waiver form and a summons. The Clerk also requested to serve a copy of this order on the plaintiff.

No later than 40 days after service of this order via email on CDCR, CDCR will provide the Court a completed CDCR Report of E-Service Waiver advising the court which defendant listed in this order will be waiving service of process without the need for service by the United States Marshal Service (USMS) and which defendant declines to waive service or could not be reached. CDCR also shall provide a copy of the CDCR Report of E-Service Waiver to the California Attorney General's Office which, within 21 days, will file with the Court a waiver of service of process for the defendant if he is waiving service.

Upon receipt of the CDCR Report of E-Service Waiver, the Clerk is requested to prepare for each defendant who has not waived service according to the CDCR Report of E-Service Waiver a USM-205 Form. The Clerk will provide to the USMS the completed USM-205 forms and copies of this order, the summons and the operative complaint for service upon each defendant who has not waived service. The Clerk will also provide to the USMS a copy of the CDCR Report of E-Service Waiver.

2. All communications by plaintiff with the Court must be served on defendants, or defendants' counsel once counsel has been designated, by mailing a true copy of the document to defendants or defendants' counsel.

3. It is plaintiff's responsibility to prosecute this case. Plaintiff must keep the Court informed of any change of address by filing a separate paper with the clerk headed “Notice of Change of Address.” He also must comply with the Court's orders in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Querol v. Richards

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 25, 2023
22-cv-01800-JD (N.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2023)
Case details for

Querol v. Richards

Case Details

Full title:ROMMEL QUEROL, Plaintiff, v. RICHARDS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 25, 2023

Citations

22-cv-01800-JD (N.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2023)