From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Queen Tufting Company v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia
Oct 20, 1977
239 S.E.2d 27 (Ga. 1977)

Summary

holding section 3-705 six-year limitation applied where policy provided for twelve-month period "unless a longer period of time is provided by applicable statute"

Summary of this case from Brookins v. State Farm Fire and Gas Co.

Opinion

32449.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 12, 1977.

DECIDED OCTOBER 20, 1977.

Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia — 141 Ga. App. 792 ( 234 S.E.2d 354) (1977).

Mitchell, Mitchell, Coppedge, Boyett Wester, William I. Boyett, for appellant.

Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman Ashmore, Frederick E. Link, Robert L. Pennington, for appellee.


This court granted the application for writ of certiorari to review the decision and judgment of the Court of Appeals in Queen Tufting Co. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 141 Ga. App. 792 ( 234 S.E.2d 354) (1977). The Court of Appeals affirmed the grant of a summary judgment for the defendant on the ground that plaintiff's failure to file suit within the time stated in the insurance contract barred the action. The provision of the contract stated: "No suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable in any Court of law or equity unless the insured shall have fully complied with all the requirements of this policy, nor unless commenced within twelve (12) months next after the happening of the loss, unless a longer period of time is provided by applicable statute."

The loss occurred approximately two and one-half years prior to the filing of the suit.

A majority of the Court of Appeals held that Code § 3-705, which provides for a six-year limitation on contract actions, was inapplicable. Three judges dissented. In our opinion, Code § 3-705 is the applicable statute.

Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur, except Hill, J., who concurs in the judgment only, and Marshall, J., who is disqualified.


ARGUED SEPTEMBER 12, 1977 — DECIDED OCTOBER 20, 1977.


Summaries of

Queen Tufting Company v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia
Oct 20, 1977
239 S.E.2d 27 (Ga. 1977)

holding section 3-705 six-year limitation applied where policy provided for twelve-month period "unless a longer period of time is provided by applicable statute"

Summary of this case from Brookins v. State Farm Fire and Gas Co.

In Queen Tufting Co., the contract stated, "No suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable in any Court of law or equity unless... commenced within twelve (12) months next after the happening of the loss, unless a longer period of time is provided by applicable statute."

Summary of this case from Relf v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

In Queen Tufting, the Georgia Supreme Court summarily reversed the Georgia Court of Appeals' affirmance of a summary judgment for the insurance company and held that a general 6-year statute of limitations for contract actions was applicable.

Summary of this case from Northwest Steel Erection Co. v. Zurich American Insurance

In Queen Tufting Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., 239 Ga. 843, 239 S.E.2d 27 (1977), the court held that the plaintiff's suit was not barred when the limitations clause in the policy provided that suit must be brought within twelve months "unless a longer period of time is provided by applicable statute."

Summary of this case from Nicholson v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

In Queen Tufting and General Instrument, the courts ruled that their general statutes of limitations on written contracts were the "applicable statutes" referred to in the policies involved, but only after satisfying themselves that there was no specific State statute directed at limitation clauses of insurance policies.

Summary of this case from Wabash Power Equip. Co. v. Int'l Ins. Co.

In Queen Tufting Co. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 239 Ga. 843, supra, the insurance policy provided: "No suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable in any Court of law or equity unless... commenced within twelve (12) months next after the happening of the loss, unless a longer period of time is provided by applicable statute."

Summary of this case from Herring v. Middle Ga. Mut. Ins. Co.
Case details for

Queen Tufting Company v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:QUEEN TUFTING COMPANY v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Oct 20, 1977

Citations

239 S.E.2d 27 (Ga. 1977)
239 S.E.2d 27

Citing Cases

Gravely v. Southern Trust Ins. Co.

" Plaintiff, having filed suit some eighteen months after the loss, contended that under Queen Tufting Co. v.…

Herring v. Middle Ga. Mut. Ins. Co.

To this we cannot agree. It is quite clear the language is referring to the actual loss to the insured. In…