From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quan v. Bam Trading Servs.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 16, 2024
23-cv-05215-AGT (N.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-05215-AGT

01-16-2024

LONG QUAN, Plaintiff, v. BAM TRADING SERVICES, INC., Defendant.


ORDER RE: DKT. NO. 18

ALEX G. TSE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In response to the Court's order to show cause at Dkt. 15, Plaintiff states that “the parties agree that Plaintiff probably opened the account with Defendant's parent company Binance.com,” and “the parties agreed that once it's confirmed that Defendant was not involved [in freezing the account], Plaintiff would dismiss Defendant from the case.” Dkt. 18 ¶ 2.

To the extent Defendant wishes to comment or has anything to add to the Plaintiff's submission at Dkt. 18, Defendant may file a response by January 23, 2024. After that date, the pending motion to dismiss will be deemed submitted on the papers.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Quan v. Bam Trading Servs.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 16, 2024
23-cv-05215-AGT (N.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Quan v. Bam Trading Servs.

Case Details

Full title:LONG QUAN, Plaintiff, v. BAM TRADING SERVICES, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 16, 2024

Citations

23-cv-05215-AGT (N.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2024)