From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quan v. BAM Trading Servs.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 4, 2024
23-cv-05215-AGT (N.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-05215-AGT

01-04-2024

LONG QUAN, Plaintiff, v. BAM TRADING SERVICES, INC., Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

ALEX G. TSE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendant filed a motion to dismiss on November 16, 2023, and the plaintiff's response was due on November 30, 2023, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(a). See Dkt. 8. Plaintiff did not file a timely opposition or a statement of non-opposition, nor did plaintiff seek any additional time to file a response. Defendant filed a reply on December 7, 2023, noting in part that the motion was unopposed. Dkt. 12.

Plaintiff is ordered to file a response to this order, by January 9, 2024, to show cause explaining why an opposition or statement of non-opposition was not timely filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Quan v. BAM Trading Servs.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 4, 2024
23-cv-05215-AGT (N.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2024)
Case details for

Quan v. BAM Trading Servs.

Case Details

Full title:LONG QUAN, Plaintiff, v. BAM TRADING SERVICES, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 4, 2024

Citations

23-cv-05215-AGT (N.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2024)