From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pyron v. Murphy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jun 10, 2020
File No. 20-cv-1017 (ECT/KMM) (D. Minn. Jun. 10, 2020)

Opinion

File No. 20-cv-1017 (ECT/KMM)

06-10-2020

Allen L. Pyron, Plaintiff, v. Thane Murphy, Office of Special Investigations-Moose Lake; Tina Joseph, Accounting Technician, MSOP-Moose Lake; Emily Johnson, U.S. Bank Sales & Service Manager; and Tony Vittorio, U.S. Bank Branch Manager, sued in their individual and official capacities, Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Allen L. Pyron ("Pyron") commenced this action pro se by filing a complaint [ECF No. 1] and an application to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") [ECF No. 2]. The case is before the Court on a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") [ECF No. 5] issued by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), Magistrate Judge Menendez recommends dismissing Pyron's Complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and denying his IFP application. R&R at 4. Pyron filed objections to the R&R. ECF No. 6. Pyron's objections do not respond to, or call into question, the bases for Magistrate Judge Menendez's recommendations. See United States v. Miller, 425 U.S. 435, 440-43 (1976) (finding that a depositor has no legitimate expectation of privacy in third-party bank records and, therefore, that the Fourth Amendment does not protect against searches of those records); 12 U.S.C. § 3401(3) (defining "Government authorit[ies]" to include "any agency or department of the United States, or any officer, employee, or agent thereof"). Nonetheless, because Pyron has objected, the R&R will be reviewed de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 72.2(b)(3). The Court has undertaken that de novo review and has concluded that Magistrate Judge Menendez's analysis and conclusions are correct.

Therefore, based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Objections to the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 6] are OVERRULED;

2. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 5] is ACCEPTED in full;

3. This matter is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and

4. Plaintiff Allen L. Pyron's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs [ECF No. 2] is DENIED.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: June 10, 2020

s/ Eric C. Tostrud

Eric C. Tostrud

United States District Court


Summaries of

Pyron v. Murphy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jun 10, 2020
File No. 20-cv-1017 (ECT/KMM) (D. Minn. Jun. 10, 2020)
Case details for

Pyron v. Murphy

Case Details

Full title:Allen L. Pyron, Plaintiff, v. Thane Murphy, Office of Special…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jun 10, 2020

Citations

File No. 20-cv-1017 (ECT/KMM) (D. Minn. Jun. 10, 2020)