From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pyche v. Kaminski

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 23, 2009
Case No. SC09-1002 (Fla. Sep. 23, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. SC09-1002.

September 23, 2009.

Lower Tribunal No(s). 2D08-5035, 03-CC-005271.


Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to reinstatement of the petition for writ of certiorari in Case No. 2D08-5035, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000).

All motions or other requests for relief are also denied.

PARIENTE, LEWIS, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pyche v. Kaminski

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 23, 2009
Case No. SC09-1002 (Fla. Sep. 23, 2009)
Case details for

Pyche v. Kaminski

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS PYCHE, Petitioner(s) v. JAMES KAMINSKI SANDRA KAMINSKI…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 23, 2009

Citations

Case No. SC09-1002 (Fla. Sep. 23, 2009)