From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Putnam v. U. T. Co. of Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Nov 25, 1935
181 A. 778 (Pa. 1935)

Opinion

October 10, 1935.

November 25, 1935.

Before FRAZER, C. J., KEPHART, SCHAFFER, MAXEY, DREW, LINN and BARNES, JJ.

Appeals, Nos. 147, 148, 150 and 151, March T., 1935, by plaintiffs, respectively, from orders of C. P. Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1935, Nos. 3984, 3988, 3986 and 4021, respectively, in cases of Samuel H. Putnam v. United Traction Company of Pittsburgh; Samuel H. Putnam, Jr., v. Same; The Marietta Realty Company v. Same, and C. Louise Bryce v. Same. Orders reversed.

John M. Reed, for appellants.

Robert L. Kirkpatrick, with him Edwin W. Smith, of Reed, Smith, Shaw McClay and Maynard Teall and E. P. Griffiths, for appellee.


These appeals were argued together and will be determined in one opinion. They involve the same questions disposed of in Ernest A. Frey v. United Traction Co. of Pittsburgh, 320 Pa. 196. We consider the records amended by marking the suits to the use (as stated in Frey's Appeal).

The orders appealed from are reversed, the records are remitted to the end that judgment be entered for the plaintiff for such sum as to right and justice may belong unless other legal or equitable cause be shown to the court below why such judgment should not be so entered.


Summaries of

Putnam v. U. T. Co. of Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Nov 25, 1935
181 A. 778 (Pa. 1935)
Case details for

Putnam v. U. T. Co. of Pittsburgh

Case Details

Full title:Putnam, Appellant, v. United Traction Company of Pittsburgh (No. 2)…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 25, 1935

Citations

181 A. 778 (Pa. 1935)
181 A. 778