From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pusz v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA BRYSON CITY DIVISION
Dec 20, 2011
2:11 CV 48 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 20, 2011)

Opinion

2:11 CV 48

12-20-2011

RAYMOND EUGENE PUSZ, Plaintiff v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.


ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the court on Russell Bowling's Application for Admission to Practice Pro Hac Vice of Jaya Shurtliff. It appearing that Jaya Shurtliff is a member in good standing with the New York Bar and will be appearing with Russell Bowling, a member in good standing with the Bar of this court, that all admission fees have been paid, and that the email address of the attorney seeking admission has been provided, the court enters the following Order.

ORDER

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Russell Bowling's Application for Admission to Practice Pro Hac Vice (#4) of Jaya Shurtliff is GRANTED, and that Jaya Shurtliff is ADMITTED to practice, pro hac vice, before the Bar of this court while associated with Russell Bowling.

_____________

Dennis L. Howell

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Pusz v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA BRYSON CITY DIVISION
Dec 20, 2011
2:11 CV 48 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Pusz v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND EUGENE PUSZ, Plaintiff v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA BRYSON CITY DIVISION

Date published: Dec 20, 2011

Citations

2:11 CV 48 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 20, 2011)

Citing Cases

Lance v. Berryhill

Bird v. Commissioner, 699 F.3d 337, 343 (4 Cir. 2012) (also holding that such a determination is evidence of…